Libs Who Want To Move To Canada Blocked By Its Strict Immigration Policies

Libs Who Want To Move To Canada Blocked By Its Strict Immigration Policies


By Luke Rosiak

Liberals seeking to move to Canada because they are unhappy with the election results are finding that Canada won’t take them because its immigration policies exclude those who won’t contribute to the economy.

One of the policies of President Donald Trump that has some Democrats claiming they want to jump ship is his pledge to limit immigration from people whose lives in America would be dependent on welfare. Trump promises “extreme vetting” before accepting immigrants or refugees.

But Democrats looking to move from the U.S. to Australia, Canada and other wealthy English-speaking nations are learning that those nations already have similar policies.

A top law firm known for obtaining Canadian visas for U.S. citizens says there are three main ways to get in: by having in-demand job skills, by owning a business or having a high net worth, or by having relatives already there.

Canada’s official immigration page also sets a high bar, listing opportunities to “immigrate as a skilled worker,” “immigrate by starting a business and creating jobs” or “immigrate by investing in the Canadian economy.” The website had so many visitors immediately after Trump’s win that the server crashed.

It also maintains a refugee category, but targets people who have already been displaced “outside their home country,” and not those who want to move from their home country to Canada.

Canada is willing only to be a last resort for refugees; such candidates are not eligible if they “have another durable solution for protection, such as an offer to be resettled in another country.”

Even then, the nation known for its hockey and its Maple syrup then asks individual Canadians to pick up the bill, by either voluntarily funding the program or taking refugees in to their own homes. Individuals must be “selected as a government-assisted or privately sponsored refugee, or have the funds needed to support” themselves and any dependents after they “arrive in Canada.”

Canada does have a special program for Syrian refugees and accepted 40,000 since November, 2015, about four times as many as the U.S. during the same time-span under former President Barack Obama.

As one hysterical liberal lamented on Facebook, “What are the actual implications of these Executive Douche Orders? Should I just pack my bags and move to Canada?” After researching the Canadian immigration system, the individual posted that he had determined that “ironically,” as an artist who could not afford to buy property and only rented a loft in Brooklyn, Canada had no desire in taking him in.

Immigration rules for Australia and similar nations are comparable, with strict rules focused on accepting people that are a net value-added to their economy. (RELATED: Barbra Streisand Says She Plans To Move To Australia If Trump Wins)

Canada’s rules could be one reason Al Sharpton — who has failed to pay debts, including taxes — reneged on a promise to move there following Trump’s win. Lena Dunham also backtracked on her pledge to relocate, in spite of her assets.

Follow Luke on Twitter. Send tips to
Copyright 2017 Daily Caller News Foundation
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact



Latest Stories

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


  • xdreamartist
    January 28, 2017, 9:39 am

    Good story.

  • valleygirl43
    January 28, 2017, 3:22 pm

    That makes perfect sense. Why would Canada want to take in people who don’t have job skills or any money and then have to support them with welfare and health care and/or train them in a trade? It’s been that way for years to get to live in the States. Why should it be any different here? If any of their wealthy people or highly skilled people (such as doctors and specialists that are much needed here) wanted to come here, certainly that makes sense. They would be contributing to the country, not taking from it. Their lives aren’t in danger over there (at least not yet, and hopefully won’t be)

  • Less Han
    January 31, 2017, 7:53 pm

    If anyone actually wanted to leave they had and still have ample time and ways of doing so. I believe their words should be taken as being said in the heat of the moments not lies to try and back up their agendas.

  • Tatiana Covington
    February 2, 2017, 7:33 pm

    Cher said she’d move to Jupiter…