How This Governor’s Emphatic Veto of State Income Tax Thwarts Mandate for Paid Family Leave

In bright red, all capital letters, New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu slapped a big “VETO” on the Democrat-controlled Legislature’s bill to implement a tax on workers to pay for a government-administered paid family leave program.

Alongside his signed and dated veto, Sununu, a Republican, wrote: “No Income Tax. Not Now! Not Ever!”

New Hampshire is one of only seven states across the U.S. that does not impose a state income tax on its residents.

By vetoing the bill, Sununu protected New Hampshire workers from a 0.5% tax that would have cost the average worker $267 per year.

That tax would have gone toward a government-mandated paid family leave program providing workers with up to 12 weeks of paid family or medical leave covering 60% of their wages.

In reality, covering the leave that workers say they need would require about five times the proposed 0.5% rate ($1,333/worker). To date, paid family leave taxes in other states have stayed below 1% of pay, but that’s largely because the programs lack awareness and accessibility. In New Jersey, only 1% of workers who were eligible for the program actually used it.

There’s widespread support for paid family leave across the U.S., but that support plummets when it comes to the costs and trade-offs that would come with a federal paid family leave program.

That’s important because when the government sets the rules—instead of letting employers and workers design policies based on their own terms—a paid family leave program is far more likely to have unintended consequences and excessive costs.

Mandated family and medical leave can result in hiring discrimination against young women. Economic studies show that California’s and New Jersey’s state-based paid family leave programs increased unemployment rates for young women.

Moreover, when mandated, paid family leave reduces women’s likelihood for promotions and their relative earnings.

When the government sets the eligibility criteria and instills the notion that paid family leave is free, far more people are likely to take leave. That has real consequences for employers and the products and services they provide.

In Denmark, a generous one-year paid family leave program for nurses led to a rapid and persistent 12% decline in nursing employment, a 17% increase in in-patient readmissions, an 89% increase in newborn readmissions, a delay in technology adoption, and a 13% increase in nursing home mortality over the three-year period following enactment.

Those unintended consequences are why Sununu and other policymakers are looking for ways to expand access to paid family leave by giving workers and employers more options instead of higher taxes and more restrictions.

Sununu and Vermont Gov. Phil Scott, a fellow Republican in a neighboring state, have a proposal that would let workers and employers choose whether or not they want to opt into a state-established but privately administered paid family leave program. The estimated cost would be $200 to $285 per worker per year.

Another way to accomplish the equivalent without the state getting involved at all—and thus saving taxpayers potential startup and administrative expenses—would be to allow private employers to band together to form so-called association insurance plans covering short-term disability or paid family leave plans.

This structure exists, with limitations, for association health insurance plans.

Another option, at the federal level, is to pass the Working Families Flexibility Act that would let lower-income hourly workers choose whether they want to receive time-and-a-half of paid leave or pay when they work overtime hours.

Although public sector workers are allowed to make that choice, private-sector workers currently cannot.

Congress could also let workers tap their retirement savings accounts without penalty to use for paid family leave.

A combination of options that makes it easier for employers to offer paid family leave and easier for workers to take it is the right approach, because a one-size-fits-all government program simply cannot meet workers’ and employers’ needs in the way that programs designed on their own terms can.


Portrait of Rachel Greszler

Rachel Greszler is research fellow in economics, budget, and entitlements in the Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget, of the Institute for Economic Freedom, at The Heritage Foundation. Read her research.


Republished with permission from The Daily Signal. The original article may be read here.

Related posts


wind creek casino online play July 1, 2020 at 8:14 am

online casinos

sugarhouse casino online

viagra sildenafil July 2, 2020 at 10:44 pm

viagra online usa

sildenafil generic

slot games July 5, 2020 at 12:34 pm

doubleu casino online casino

online casino real money us

casino games July 7, 2020 at 2:33 pm

play for real online casino games

online casino games

cialis prices July 9, 2020 at 11:43 pm

cialis generic name

cialis tadalafil

personal loans July 11, 2020 at 9:28 pm

instant loans

payday loans online

personal loans July 15, 2020 at 2:09 am

loans for bad credit

quick cash loans

cash advance online July 18, 2020 at 4:53 am

short term loans

personal loans

viagra prescription July 21, 2020 at 6:27 am

viagra cost

viagra cost

cialis 20 July 23, 2020 at 9:03 pm

new cialis

generic cialis

cialis 20 July 26, 2020 at 8:05 pm

buy cialis

5 mg cialis

cialis to buy July 28, 2020 at 4:07 am

new cialis

cialis internet

cialis internet July 30, 2020 at 5:02 pm

cialis generic

cialis generic

new cialis August 2, 2020 at 2:43 am

cialis buy

cialis generic

20 cialis August 5, 2020 at 2:41 am

20 cialis

generic cialis

sildenafil viagra August 8, 2020 at 5:32 am

viagra without doctor

order viagra

real money online casinos usa August 10, 2020 at 5:39 pm

casino games win real money

casino online real money

online gambling August 11, 2020 at 11:06 am

play for real online casino games

casino world

free casino games August 15, 2020 at 10:10 am

gambling casino

slot machine games

viagra coupon August 22, 2020 at 2:19 am

sildenafil dosage

sildenafil online

sildenafil 100mg August 24, 2020 at 11:05 pm

viagra prescription

sildenafil 20

viagra without doctor August 27, 2020 at 5:01 pm

herbal viagra

sildenafil citrate

generic tadalafil August 31, 2020 at 12:11 am

cialis online

cialis generic date

buy cialis September 3, 2020 at 2:42 pm

cialis pill

cialis buy online

tadalafil online canadian pharmacy September 5, 2020 at 8:04 pm

tadalafil 10mg

cialis buy cialis online

buy cialis online overnight shipping September 11, 2020 at 3:01 am

tadalafil vs sildenafil

cialis cialis online

gambling casino September 13, 2020 at 6:59 am

casino online real money

casino online games

online casinos real money September 16, 2020 at 5:36 pm

casino world

online casino usa real money

Buy cheap viagra online November 12, 2020 at 10:33 pm

Get viagra fast

Pfizer viagra 50 mg online

Leave a Comment