Governor Johnson’s “Carbon Fee” Proposal Had Some Merit, After All

Carbon Fee

Governor Johnson’s “Carbon Fee” Proposal Had Some Merit, After All

by Brett Linley

Nothing will burn through your libertarian street-cred faster than proposing taxes. In reality, it doesn’t matter what kind of tax it is. The tax’s purpose doesn’t really matter, either. All that matters, when rubber hits the road, is that you want more of people’s money.

Gary Johnson made this “fatal” error when he explored what he called a “carbon fee.” Truthfully, this so-called “fee” doesn’t appear any different than a tax. It would essentially function as a tax, and would attempt to reign in the environmental costs of carbon.

Conservatives and libertarians have made their cases against a carbon tax well known. Hard-liners argue that such a tax would hike energy costs across the board. Moreover, many consider such taxes regressive. In theory, the poor would suffer the most of anyone.

This article will not discuss these positions. To put it simply, people already know what they believe. However, carbon taxes have rarely received a fair shake. People can freely assemble their own opinions, and they can take any stance that they want. Noting this, we must recognize that we cheapen the intellectual debate when failing to consider widely-advocated alternatives.

People Should Face Responsibility for the Costs That They Impose on Others

Take a moment, and forget about the carbon tax. Imagine a different scenario. Pretend that, as you’re walking down the street, you see a man buying a pack of cigarettes from a drug store. As a libertarian, you don’t care what people do with their bodies, and keep walking.

However, you stop as the man comes up to you. Before you have a chance to react, he pulls a lit cigarette from his mouth and blows a bunch of smoke in your face. Then, he walks away. Without your consent, desire to join the transaction, or any prior interaction with the vendor at all, you’ve been forced to ingest cigarette toxins without any of the benefit. Welcome to the world of carbon.

This example is obviously ridiculous, but the principles are essentially the same. It’s true, carbon fuels much of our daily lives. However, some people who may not rely on carbon-based fuels so heavily still have to pay a price: pollution.

Pollution is the classic case of an externality. Two people transact, and a third-party bears costs that it didn’t ask for a part of. The third-party didn’t ask to fuel your home, for example, but it has to deal with the negative environmental consequences of it.

A carbon tax attempts to rein in some of these excess costs. As it stands, the law states that buyers and sellers of carbon products should pay a price of $0 for the costs that they inflict on others. From a libertarian standpoint, this hardly seems adequate.

A Level Playing Field is Necessary for Effective Policy

The sad reality is that the market does a less-than-stellar job of covering these situations. Increasing private property rights would undoubtedly be a step forward. More freedom is always preferable to authority.

However, the cost of enforcing these rights when it comes to air pollution could be prohibitively high. It would be hard to prove that traces of air pollution above your house came from any specific manufacturer.

In a sense, a carbon tax acts as a protection on private property rights. Since an individual likely lacks the mechanisms with which to impose a cost on polluters, the government acts to impose such costs on his or her behalf.

Critics will often cite how a carbon tax places an undue burden on a specific industry. All the while, so-called “green energy” sources continue to pile on massive subsidies. This is a fair point, and must be accounted for if a carbon tax is to be taken seriously.

In reality, we should abolish all energy subsidies. “Green energy” should not be given special treatment just because it is relatively new. However, with the carbon tax, the price of carbon would ultimately come into line with the costs imposed on society through pollution.

The Problems With The Tax Are Not Insurmountable

Libertarians are correct to bring up the issues with the tax. It is certainly not a cure-all, and there would be difficulties implementing it. This does not mean that it shouldn’t be talked about at all.

Rising energy costs are regressive, meaning that they disproportionately hurt the poor. However, rebates funded by the tax revenue could correct for this problem.

Global warming is no longer a myth that can be easily discarded. Carbon producers have been, realistically, free-riding. When people don’t have to bear the costs of their actions, there are inefficient incentives. A carbon tax attempts to iron these inefficiencies out.

Of course, it’s hard to say what the proper tax-rate should be. The state lacks the necessary information to make good choices most of the time, as most libertarians recognize. However, we cannot use this excuse to do nothing. Sometimes, we must pursue solutions we may not love to solve serious problems.

A carbon tax is an imperfect solution to a big issue. Economic principles support such a tax. The urgency of climate change supports action. It’s time for libertarians to put down their purity tests and solve a problem.

Related posts

29 comments

ocean casino online June 29, 2020 at 5:36 pm

virgin casino online nj

best online casino usa

real casinos online no deposit July 1, 2020 at 10:53 pm

best online casino usa

san manuel casino online

viagra pills July 3, 2020 at 2:47 pm

cheapest generic viagra

buy viagra online cheap

casino July 6, 2020 at 12:19 am

online casino for real cash

online casino games

best real casino online July 8, 2020 at 4:16 am

slots online

san manuel casino online

tadalafil reviews July 11, 2020 at 2:57 am

generic cialis canada

buy cialis generic online

quick cash loans July 12, 2020 at 10:27 pm

loan online

payday loans

loan online July 15, 2020 at 10:56 pm

installment loans

cash advance online

cash loans July 19, 2020 at 12:25 am

cash payday

cash advance online

viagra prescription July 22, 2020 at 2:17 am

viagra prescription

viagra cost

cialis 5 mg July 24, 2020 at 8:58 pm

cialis buy

cialis 5 mg

cialis buy July 29, 2020 at 12:25 am

cialis 5 mg

cialis buy

5 mg cialis July 31, 2020 at 11:28 am

20 cialis

5 mg cialis

20 cialis August 3, 2020 at 12:12 am

generic cialis

cialis 5 mg

cialis 5 mg August 6, 2020 at 5:21 am

buy cialis

buy cialis

play for real online casino games August 9, 2020 at 3:38 am

casino online

online casinos usa

real money casino games August 12, 2020 at 4:30 pm

free casino games

casino real money

online casino August 16, 2020 at 12:49 pm

real money casino online

real money online casinos usa

online casino real money August 20, 2020 at 9:25 am

casino online slots

slot machine

sildenafil generic August 23, 2020 at 9:51 am

viagra without doctor prescription

online viagra

viagra sildenafil August 25, 2020 at 3:33 pm

cheap viagra online canadian pharmacy

cheapest viagra online

cheapest viagra online August 28, 2020 at 2:34 pm

cheap generic viagra

viagra no prescription

cheap tadalafil August 31, 2020 at 11:27 pm

cialis pills

tadalafil cialis

cialis buy online September 4, 2020 at 7:02 pm

tadalafil reviews

canadian pharmacy cialis

online casino games for real money September 14, 2020 at 6:48 pm

real money online casinos usa

casino gambling

free slots September 18, 2020 at 12:51 am

golden nugget online casino

casino games win real money

Get viagra fast November 13, 2020 at 9:02 pm

Rx generic viagra

Price check 50mg viagra

see page May 4, 2024 at 7:19 pm

… [Trackback]

[…] Here you can find 38702 additional Info to that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/libertarians-theres-good-case-carbon-tax/ […]

blote tieten May 14, 2024 at 4:06 pm

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More on that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/libertarians-theres-good-case-carbon-tax/ […]

Leave a Comment