LISTEN TO TLR’S LATEST PODCAST:
By: Elias J. Atienza
Yesterday, the U.S Court of Appeals 4th Circuit ruled that there is no right to “assault weapons”, weapons such as the AR-15, which reserved an earlier decision by a district court. Gun rights groups are predictably furious and gun control groups are predictably ecstatic.
Maryland passed a law banning the sale, possession, purchase, or transfer of “assault weapons”, such as the AR-15, AK-47, and other semiautomatic rifles. It also banned copies and magazines that carried more than 10 rounds.
The majority ruled that Maryland’s ban would be upheld and it started off its opinion by citing several mass shootings that happened with semiautomatic rifles; Aurora, San Bernardino, Newton, and others.
“Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war,” Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the landmark Heller case, which granted the right to own pistols in Washington D.C excluded such coverage.
“The next effect of these military combat features,” the majority concluded, “is a capability for lethality—more wounds, more serious, in more victims—far beyond that of other firearms in general, including other semiautomatic guns.” Likewise, the banned large-capacity magazines “are particularly designed and most suitable for military and law enforcement applications”—specifically, to “enable a shooter to hit multiple human targets very rapidly.”
Judge William Traxler issued a dissent, where he argued the court had “”has gone to greater lengths than any other court to eviscerate the constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear arms.”
“For a law-abiding citizen who, for whatever reason, chooses to protect his home with a semi-automatic rifle instead of a semi-automatic handgun, Maryland’s law clearly imposes a significant burden on the exercise of the right to arm oneself at home, and it should at least be subject to strict scrutiny review before it is allowed to stand,” Traxler wrote.
Gun rights advocates are expected to appeal this decision and it will most likely reach the Supreme Court. With the addition of Neil Gorsuch, whenever he gets confirmed, it will be an interesting case to see.
32 comments
hard rock casino online
hard rock casino online
canada viagra
buy viagra
online gambling
empire casino online
online casino for real cash
online gambling
tadalafil 20 mg
buy cialis generic online
quick cash loans
loans online
cash loans
cash advance
payday advance
loan online
viagra pills
viagra for sale
cialis internet
cialis generic
cialis internet
generic for cialis
cialis to buy
cialis 20
generic for cialis
cialis 20
cialis buy
cialis 5 mg
casinos
casino slot
golden nugget online casino
best online casino usa
online casino usa real money
best real casino online
viagra pill
viagra cost
sildenafil 100mg
sildenafil 100
sildenafil price
buy cheap viagra
cialis buy online
tadalafil 10mg
tadalafil online canadian pharmacy
viagra vs cialis
canadian pharmacy cialis
cialis buy
online casino
real money casino games
gambling casino
slot machine
Buy viagra professional
Order viagra usa
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/appeals-court-rules-no-right-to-assault-weapons-upholds-maryland-ban/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/appeals-court-rules-no-right-to-assault-weapons-upholds-maryland-ban/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/appeals-court-rules-no-right-to-assault-weapons-upholds-maryland-ban/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/appeals-court-rules-no-right-to-assault-weapons-upholds-maryland-ban/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/appeals-court-rules-no-right-to-assault-weapons-upholds-maryland-ban/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/appeals-court-rules-no-right-to-assault-weapons-upholds-maryland-ban/ […]