Can The Tea Party Go to Space?

“This is the Tea Party with better gadgets.” Natasha Tiku

Neil deGrasse Tyson says that space is dangerous. Tyson argues that we won’t go to space unless it makes some kind of rational sense.

Tyson is criticizing the ideas of SpaceX’s Elon Musk, who is working to create cheaper rocket fuel tanks, lowering the cost of entry to space. Musk wants to put humans on Mars in just 12 years.

WATCH: Drone Copter Chases Rocket Launch – Race To Colonize Space is Underway!

“It’s not possible. Space is dangerous. It’s expensive. There are unquantified risks. Combine all of those under one umbrella; you cannot establish a free market capitalization of that enterprise,” Tyson says.

So we need the government to take expensive, unquantified risks that don’t make sense? Sounds like standard operating procedure.

VIDEO: Neil deGrasse Tyson on free market space travel
 

Wrong, Mr. Tyson!

One young entrepreneur gave a speech recently at a web startup conference called, “A radical dream for making techno utopias a reality.” Balaji Srinivasan spoke about “Silicon Valley’s Ultimate Exit”, where entrepreneurs might escape to space in order to avoid regulations that cripple innovative startups. “We need to build opt-in society, outside the US, run by technology.”

WATCH: “Roads? Where we’re going we don’t need roads!” (VIDEO) 

Srinivasan spoke about his idea for self-sustaining experiments where people would live under a government run by Silicon Valley. He looked at the accomplishments of the tech sector as an example for how society should be run. “We didn’t securitize mortgages, order bailouts, [or] start wars,” his slides read.

VIDEO: “A radical dream for making techno utopias a reality.”


 

Srinivasan complained that with the rise of 3D printing, regulation is being turned into “Digital Rights Management”. He expressed fears for the pushback from governments against digital currencies like Bitcoins using “packet filtering”, a fancy word for blocking traffic from sources that authorities deem inappropriate. But Srinivasan wants to escape this world, and he has hope for the future if we can accomplish it.

“The best part is this, the people who think this is weird, the people who sneer at the frontier, who hate technology, won’t follow you there,” he says. But some people aren’t so convinced.

READ: Snooty Yale Professor Shocked to Learn that Tea Party Understands Science!

New York Magazine’s Kevin Roosk worries about this attitude in light of the recent U.S. government shutdown. He writes that, “a certain strain of influential Silicon Valley thought has moved past passive political apathy and into a kind of anarchist cheerleading. Dysfunction and shutdowns are good, this line of thinking goes, because it hamstrings Washington’s ability to mess with the private sector’s profit-making schemes. And as long as the Bay Area is still churning out successful start-ups, what does it matter if hundreds of thousands of government workers are furloughed, essential services are cut off for low-income Americans, and the threat of a sovereign default endangers the entire economy?”

That’s silly. In space we don’t need government workers. The only essential services will be life support systems that would naturally need to be self-sustaining. Profit and loss might mean life or death in space, where people would be incentivized enough to provide for their own security and safety.

Valleywag’s Natasha Tiku writes:

This is the Tea Party with better gadgets. It’s probably no coincidence that Srinivasan’s genetics startup (started in a Stanford dorm room, naturally) has raised more than $65 million in funding from investors like Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund. Thiel, of course, was a big backer of Ted Cruz and single-handedly funded a Ron Paul super PAC before the last presidential election.

Time For Libertarians To Go Galt? 

Libertarian activists have been pushing for seasteading for years, believing that the way to escape crippling government sanctions is to spread out into international waters. These kinds of projects have received seed capital, but not yet come to fruition. But if Elon Musk is successful in getting to Mars, that might be the more practical alternative.

My only question is… if all the people who loved freedom ever left the earth… who would be taxed to securitize the mortgages, order bailouts, or start the wars?

Now is the time to go… before it’s too late. 

 

12 comments

Way2MuchGov October 26, 2013 at 11:44 pm

Sign me up for a ticket off this rock, I’m good with a calculator and a wrench!

Austin Petersen October 26, 2013 at 11:50 pm

Ha! Glad you dug it. I’m sad this isn’t getting more traction. Too meta I guess.

Way2MuchGov October 27, 2013 at 12:00 am

I recently did some research to find another country to expatriate to. Unfortunately, there is no place left on Earth that offers a decent standard of living along with reasonable freedoms. That leaves the stars . . . now if I can only get my wife on board.

Austin Petersen October 27, 2013 at 12:06 am

If Elon Musk can get to Mars in 12 years, then maybe we won’t be too far behind?

Way2MuchGov October 27, 2013 at 1:24 am

Should present enough time to make the case. I’ll see you on Mars II.

Bob160 October 28, 2013 at 3:47 am

Ditto. Wife not on board. Watching American Blackout on Nat Geo tonight. Perhaps we only survive if our closest enemy is one AU away. Read J. Pournelle. A step further out. or Survival w/ Style series of the 70″s.

Jason Weakley October 27, 2013 at 4:19 am

I tend to agree with Mr. Tyson. Historically speaking he is correct. It is entirely plausible that some multi-billionaire and his friends could lead us to Mars or some other destination, but what happens when the mission fails and they lose their proverbial shirts? The NYSE will dump their stock and the company will lose investors.
Take Star Trek as a model for example. Despite the genre’s misguided interpretation of some future of evolved human nature, the mechanics of how the human race ultimately pushes the border in the fictional future is through Star Fleet, a para-government organization that represents Earth. There are independent traders in the Star Trek universe, and though the series doesn’t mention them, I am certain many of them are what we might consider giant interstellar corporations operating on massive profits. Those traders, as depicted in the series would depend on Star Fleet for the general policing of space that creates a safe environment in which to do business.
The ultimate question Tyson raises is whether or not we need government to take the initial risk, all the unknowns, and say, “No matter what it costs in life or property, we are going to do this thing.” After which you will see companies blossom out of the learned from experiences in order to make money off of new frontiers.

Gary Anderson October 28, 2013 at 1:04 am

I have long believed, the settlers will lead, F-Troop will follow. Your premise is based on the utilization of the possibility of SpaceX investors ‘losing their shirts’. It could happen. But…. Musk is refusing at this point to take the company public. He quite frequently states he doesn’t expect too many investors. Elon says he is not into SpaceX to make money. His goal for his company is to make humanity a multi-planet species. That being said, Mr. Tyson and most experts continue to use current launch costs in all mission scenarios. However, we are within 15 months of that calculus changing. SpaceX has tested the ‘Grasshopper’ rocket eight times, with the last one last week. Also the newest Falcon 9, version 1.1 launched three weeks ago laden with sensors and lots of extra ‘gadgets’. Why? Elon’s goal is to reduce the front end launch costs by a factor of 100. How so? The first stage of every rocket is expendable and is about 80-90% of the cost of the entire launch. What if instead of burning up the first stage (the tall portion) and crashing it back into the ocean, we attach retractable legs and land the baby back where she launched? Well all of a sudden, you are now just paying for upper stage (also to land and reuse), the payload, and the fuel. America and the world is about to face a paradigm change in spaceflight. Welcome to the future.
“Space: not the last frontier, but the infinite economy.”
Gary Anderson
National Coordinator and Director of Operations
TEA Party in Space

Austin Petersen October 28, 2013 at 2:29 am

Gary would you be interested in writing this for the website?

torchie4269 October 27, 2013 at 5:22 am

Well boo. I like Neil, but he’s a pretty standard issue liberal. In fact, he’s almost like a technocrat and a Luddite at the same time.

Dominicus October 30, 2013 at 8:56 pm

Then we shall wait for the Russian and Chinese governments to strap some diesel engines to a Fiat and propel mankind into the future.

Lennart Lopin October 31, 2013 at 8:24 pm

Balaji talk was very exciting. Where do they sell tickets to the “Free Gant Replublic of Mars”? Need to make sure I get one 😉

Leave a Comment