San Francisco Demands Citizens Turn Over 10+ Round Magazines (VIDEO)

Californians Looking to Mirror Colorado’s Recall Successes

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – The city of San Francisco is demanding citizens turn over their magazines that hold more than ten round of ammo in 90 days or face misdemeanor charges. The new law passed by Supervisor Malia Cohen will require citizens who don’t turn them over to sell them out-of-state or render them inoperable.

“While not a panacea, this legislation provides law enforcement with more tools to continue to address gun violence and also continues to strengthen our city’s strong stance on gun regulation,” Cohen said. “Banning assault rifles only scratches the surface,” she stated. “We need to … be better at addressing mental health concerns if we really want to solve the problem.”

The bill passed the Board of Supervisors unanimously just weeks after Governor Jerry Brown vetoed a bill that would ban the sale or possession of semiautomatic rifles with detachable magazines.

But some California residents have been emboldened by the recall of two Colorado legislators last month for attempting to restrict gun rights. A group called Free California is beginning preliminary meetings to recall state officials who sponsored or supported the 12 gun-control bills that were introduced.


Dinerboy October 31, 2013 at 1:42 pm

Notice how the democrats were quoted as saying “gun safety,” not gun control? That’s the new gag, to try and con us into thinking their motives are noble. Of course, it flies in the face of the two decades long correlation between right-to-carry and reduction in gun crime.

paul October 31, 2013 at 1:58 pm

it is not shocking that the democrats ” don’t get it ” reducing the number of rounds in a magizine doesn’t do a single thing for safety.. it’s a really stupid idea.. more about control.. kinda testing the people to see how far they can be pushed.. it takes less than 2 seconds to change a clip.. that is about enough time to stand up.. it is not time at all if your a victim trying to escape a shooter.. if they were serious, they would make gun free zones illegal, have a reporting system in the works for mentally ill folks with a leaning toward violence, attack gang violence. and other criminal activity.. reduce illegal immigrants in all areas.. enforce the laws.. so , you folks in San Fran.. ya just going to take it laying down ?

Currahee101st October 31, 2013 at 7:19 pm

Jeeze, every time I see this the persons involved have Jewish surnames.

RhetoricalQuestion November 1, 2013 at 12:44 am

That’s pretty dumb to say. Attack the opinions of these idiots, not their personhood or ethnicity.

Auntie_Social November 2, 2013 at 10:08 pm

Probably another leftist plant; posting here trying to make it appear that libertarians and conservatives are all racist at heart. It’s becoming very common strategy.

Currahee101st November 3, 2013 at 11:41 am

That statement is fact, if that gets you butt hurt too bad. And my paternal grandmother is Jewish,so what?

keepinitclassy October 31, 2013 at 7:56 pm

“Banning assault rifles only scratches the surface,” she stated. “We need to … be better at addressing mental health concerns if we really want to solve the problem.”

So they know the true issues, but still only go after things that scratch? Smart.

Inconsistencies October 31, 2013 at 7:57 pm

It’ll be a cold day in hell when laws like these are complied with or even passed in Oklahoma. There will be armed revolts.

RhetoricalQuestion November 1, 2013 at 12:43 am

We Texans will proudly guard your 6.

Gary November 1, 2013 at 3:59 pm

California. The land of fruits and nuts. I couldn’t live there.

Leave a Comment