According to multiple sources reporting to the New York Post, FBI agents involved in the Clinton email probe were required to sign extensive (and unprecedented) non-disclosure agreements before being allowed to work on the case. This means that they are legally bound from talking about anything they experienced while working on the investigation. This may not seem abnormal or unreasonable, except that it appears to be a measure that has never before been utilized for an individual case. One former FBI chief had this to say when asked about any precedent for this type of NDA:
“This is very, very unusual. I’ve never signed one, never circulated one to others.”
Another agent, currently on duty, reportedly said that he had, “never heard of such a form,” and concluded that it “sounded strange.” Sources within the FBI also reportedly believe that an inside deal was set up after former-President Bill Clinton’s shady tarmac meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch just days before Hillary was to be interviewed by the Bureau. There exists a certain amount of general “disappointment” within the organization concerning the decision not to charge Clinton.
The appearance of impropriety and corruption being expressed by these anonymous agents has not been lost on the American people. A recent poll taken by ABC News shows that a healthy majority of people believe that the FBI’s decision not to charge Hillary was wrong (most likely because they also believe she is guilty). This includes 30% of Democrats, which is closely mirrored by the 28% who say this decision by the FBI makes them less likely to support Clinton.
Is Hillary Clinton involved in mafia-esque backroom dealings at the highest level of government? Is she above the law? It seems with each passing day, more and more people believe this to be true.
What do you think? Let us know.
