US To UN Human Rights Council: End Anti-Israeli Bias Or We’re Out


By Ted Goodman

The U.S. is expected to issue an ultimatum to the United Nations Human Rights Council Tuesday: either remove anti-Israeli bias or America may withdraw.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley said Saturday that Washington would decide whether to withdraw after a three-week session in Geneva, Switzerland wraps up this month, according to Reuters.

“When the council passes more than 70 resolutions against Israel, a country with a strong human rights record, and just seven resolutions against Iran, a country with an abysmal human rights record, you know something is seriously wrong,” Haley said in a Washington Post op-ed.

U.S. Diplomat Michele Sison spoke out against what the U.S. considers “unfair singling out of Israel” during a closed session of the U.N. Security Council May 24. The U.S. has long been a critic of the council, leading to a three-year boycott from 2006 to 2009 under former President George W. Bush.

The Trump administration took issue with the most recent U.N. report that asserted Israel was endangering the territorial viability of a potential sovereign Palestine by vastly accelerating the pace of housing announcements for Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

The U.S. historically vetoed U.N. Security Council resolutions that condemned Israel for years. That pattern changed in December when former President Barack Obama’s administration allowed a critical resolution to take effect by abstaining rather than vetoing the resolution.

Western nations and allies are responding now that the Trump administration is putting the U.N. on notice. Eight groups, according to Reuters, wrote to Haley in May, saying that withdrawal would actually hurt Israel more than it would help, according to Reuters.

Haley made it clear that the U.S. is looking for the U.N. to make some changes within the Council in order for it to feel comfortable as a member.

Haley also asserted that membership on the Council must be determined through competitive voting, in order to keep human rights abusers from obtaining seats. “As it stands, regional blocs nominate candidates that are uncontested,” she explained in the op-ed. “Competition would force a candidate’s human rights record to be considered before votes were cast.”

Follow Ted on Twitter
Send Tips to
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2017 Daily Caller News Foundation
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact


Related posts


psilocybin mushrooms for sale denver September 19, 2023 at 7:17 am

… [Trackback]

[…] Information to that Topic: […]

my latest blog post November 26, 2023 at 1:04 pm

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: […]

Kampala International University January 15, 2024 at 8:21 am

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: […]

order cocaine flake with bitcoin January 21, 2024 at 12:24 am

… [Trackback]

[…] There you can find 19720 more Info to that Topic: […]

เครื่องสแกนบัตร February 14, 2024 at 7:51 pm

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: […]

Buy Kimber 1911 Grips, Compact, Crimson Trace Lasergrips, Red Laser - Rosewood Online April 10, 2024 at 6:37 pm

… [Trackback]

[…] Here you will find 9583 additional Information on that Topic: […]

jarisakti April 16, 2024 at 3:39 pm

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: […]

Leave a Comment