Top Five Science Claims We’re Not Supposed to Question

2. GMOs

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture promised to increase yields and decrease the need for pesticides. Unfortunately those promises are yet to be fulfilled. Many have questioned whether GMOs are safe to eat, citing the rise in food allergies since the mid-1990s when GMOs were introduced. Others are concerned about GMOs displacing natural varieties of crops and contamination of local agriculture which can actually result in family farmers being sued if their harvest accidentally includes the patented life forms. Others still question our dependence upon GMOs in the food supply should nature itself develop a disease for which they have no resistance. The scientific community has vigorously denied that GMOs are dangerous, yet still nineteen European countries have banned GMOs, an action which the New York Times called “the coalition of the ignorant.”

Given the fact that GMOs have not lived up to their promise of higher yields and decreased pesticide use, is it really anti-science to not use them?

2 comments

늑대닷컴 July 26, 2023 at 12:10 pm

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/top-5-science-claims-were-not-supposed-to-question/ […]

kojic acid soap December 29, 2023 at 11:15 pm

… [Trackback]

[…] Here you can find 33108 more Info to that Topic: thelibertarianrepublic.com/top-5-science-claims-were-not-supposed-to-question/ […]

Leave a Comment