LISTEN TO TLR’S LATEST PODCAST:


by Micah J. Fleck

We wish it weren’t true, but as a new report explains, it all started with a theft, and snowballed from there, ultimately resulting in a Minnesota judge legally circumventing probable cause restrictions:

A Minnesota bank received a call in January from who they thought was Douglas, their customer, asking to wire transfer $28,500 from a line of credit to another bank. To verify the transaction, the bank relied on a faxed copy of his passport. But it wasn’t him, the passport was fake, and the transfer request was fraudulent.

The Edina Police Department figured out that while searching Google Images for the victim’s name, they found the photo used on the fake passport, and investigators couldn’t find it on Yahoo or Bing. So, they theorized the suspect must have searched Google for the victim’s name while making the fake passport.

Edina Police Detective David Lindman detailed this theory in an application for a search warrant filed in early February, asking the Court to authorize a search warrant for names, email addresses, account information, and IP addresses of anyone who searched variations of the victim’s name over a five-week period of time.

But search warrants require supporting probable cause, not just mere suspicion or theory. For that reason, “anyone-who-accessed” search warrants like Detective Lindman’s can be risky to execute, as evidence could potentially be thrown out in a pretrial motion. Moreover, it’s possible that such a wide net could catch completely routine and non-criminal searches of the victim’s name by neighbors, prospective employers or business associates, journalists, or friends.

Could this type of search warrant be used to wrongly ensnare innocent people? If Google were to provide personal information on anyone who Googled the victim’s name, would Edina Police raid their homes, or would they first do further investigative work? The question is: what comes next? If you bought a pressure cooker on Amazon a month before the Boston bombing, do police get to know about it?

Under a probable cause standard, no way.

But alas, Hennepin County Judge Gary Larson signed Edina’s warrant and Detective Lindman served it about 20 minutes later. 

Orwellian, or necessary law enforcement measures? You decide.

The search warrant paperwork itself can be found at this link.

The latest news regarding this ongoing investigation, however, is that Google is taking a pro-citizen stance and fighting this warrant. Good for them. But as we know, challenging the state isn’t always successful. Google is large, though. They can likely handle the heat.


WATCH TLR’S LATEST VIDEO:

  • chris.braswell

    I profited 104,000 bucks in last twelve months by freelancing on-line a­n­d I did that by wor­king in my own time for 3+ h daily. I used a money making opportunity I stumbled upon online and I am so happy that i earned so much money. It’s newbie friendly a­­n­­d I am just so grateful that i discovered this. Here’s what I did… http://dr­.­tl/f279c7

  • bryan.christner

    I was paid 104000 dollars last year by doing an internet task furthermore I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r quite a few hours each day. I tried work opportunity I found out on the net and so I am thrilled that I was in the position to earn such decent money. It is seriously newbie-friendly and therefore I am so pleased that I found out about it. Read through exactly what I do… I was without work for six months when my early Fellow worker lastly strongly suggested me to start off freelancing from home… It was just after I earned $5000 in my first thirty days when I actually believed I am able to do this for a living! Finally I am delightful than ever… I work-at-home moreover I am my own boss now that I always wanted… I see a lot of not satisfied people around me, working the same old boring job that is sucking the daily life from them day by day… Everytime I notice somebody like that I say START FREELANCING MAN! This is where I started off >>>> www­.­cat­.­org­.­uk/snip/31323

  • ITSa341

    “ultimately resulting in a Minnesota judge legally circumventing probable cause restrictions:”

    The judge did not do it legally. If it violates the US Constitution it is illegal whether or not a judge in MN allowed it.

4K Shares
Share4K
+1
Tweet
Pin
Share
Stumble