LISTEN TO TLR’S LATEST PODCAST:
People naturally look for a path to follow. During times ancient and modern, human beings have looked for a way forward to become healthier, happier, and better in all ways.
Communism is not a path that offers a way forward. A path can be judged by its fruits, and by the character of its leading figures.
Communism has been tried for more than 100 years by hundreds of millions of people, and the results are always the same: Its fruits are death, destruction, and despair.
Its leading figures were cynical and sly men who masked their hatred of humanity with high-sounding words. By any measure, they were as dark and sinister as could be.
An Ideology of Destruction
It was at the crossroads of history, with the rise of industrialization and the decline of monarchs, when mankind was offered a Faustian bargain: Abandon your traditions and morals, and enter a new age. The promise was “heaven on earth,” and the cost was to partake in a movement to destroy morals and religious belief—and to destroy anyone who stood against this new future.
The ideas of communism, and the various schools of thought at its foundation, had already seeped deeply into the societies of Europe ahead of the 1917 October Revolution in Russia. Provocateurs presented it as a way out of the suffering of this world—with dreamy tales of an end to poverty and hunger, and a future of earthly delights.
Behind the offer were other intentions, however, and these are made clear by looking at the histories of Karl Marx and others credited with laying the foundations of communism.
In his early poem “Invocation of One in Despair,” Marx wrote about his will to create a new system. He states: “So a god has snatched from me my all … /Nothing but revenge is left to me!”
To exact this revenge, Marx states in the poem that he will “build [his] throne high overhead.” Of this throne, he writes: “Cold, tremendous shall its summit be./For its bulwark—superstitious dread,/For its Marshall—blackest agony./Who looks on it with a healthy eye,/Shall turn back, struck deathly pale and dumb;/Clutched by blind and chill Mortality/May his happiness prepare its tomb.”
Marx had many similar writings, many of which suggest his goal in using communism was never to help humanity, but instead to enact a sort of vengeance against heaven.
In his 1839 play “Oulanem,” believed to be named for a backward pronunciation of “Emmanuel,” an alternative biblical name for God, Marx begins with, “Ruined! Ruined! My time has clean run out! The clock has stopped, the pygmy house has crumbled. Soon I shall embrace eternity to my breast, and soon I shall howl gigantic curses at mankind. … If there is a Something which devours, I’ll leap within it, though I bring the world to ruins—the world which bulks between me and the abyss, I will smash to pieces with my enduring curses.”
In the book “The Making of Modern Economics,” Mark Skousen writes that a pact with the devil is a central theme in “Oulanem,” and the play “reveals a number of violent and eccentric characters.” Skousen notes that “Marx’s fixation with self-destructive behavior was prevalent through most of his life.”
Just like his character Oulanem, Marx shows in his writings a desire to not only destroy himself, but to destroy humankind along with him.
In his 1841 poem “The Player” (also translated as “The Fiddler”), Marx writes, “Look now, my blood-dark sword shall stab/Unerringly within thy soul./God neither knows nor honors art./The hellish vapors rise and fill the brain/Till I go mad and my heart is utterly changed.” He continues, “See this sword—the Prince of Darkness sold it to me,” and, “Ever more boldly I play the dance of death.”
An analysis of the above poem from biographer Robert Payne, in his 1968 book “Marx,” states, “Marx is here celebrating a satanic mystery, for the player is clearly Lucifer or Mephistopheles [a Faustian devil], and what he is playing with such frenzy is the music which accompanies the end of the world.”
He continues, “Marx clearly enjoyed the horrors he depicted, and we shall find him enjoying in very much the same way the destruction of whole classes in the ‘Communist Manifesto.’ He was a man with a peculiar faculty for relishing disaster.”
“There can be very little doubt that those interminable stories were autobiographical,” wrote Payne. “[Marx] had the Devil’s view of the world, and the Devil’s malignity. Sometimes he seemed to know that he was accomplishing works of evil.”
However bizarre Marx’s early writings were, his stated claims and goals were not far from the reality of what he created: a system that in a single century took an unprecedented number of lives. Estimates vary, but according to combined research from historians, including Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Jung Chang, and Jon Halliday, and numbers collected by “The Black Book of Communism,” published by Harvard University Press in 1999, the number is close to 150 million deaths.
Campaigns of Misery
What Marx and Friedrich Engels set forth in “The Communist Manifesto,” published in 1848, was an ideology based on struggle that, according to its own words, “abolishes all religion, and all morality.” They regarded their beliefs as being absolute—the end of human progress—and set forth a proposal that all other beliefs should be destroyed through violent revolution.
They based their version of communism in the concept of “dialectical materialism,” the absolute idea that all development comes through struggle and that life is nothing more than matter. An effect of this belief has been a disregard for human life under all communist leaders.
In 1906, Vladimir Lenin wrote in Proletary magazine that his interest was in armed struggle, aimed at “assassinating individuals, chiefs, and subordinates in the army and police,” as well as seizing money from governments and individuals.
After taking power in 1917, Lenin followed through on these concepts. Tens of thousands of people were arrested for opposing the new regime—many of whom were tortured and executed en masse.
Lenin and his followers “decided to eliminate, by legal and physical means, any challenge or resistance, even if passive, to their absolute power,” according to “The Black Book of Communism.”
“This strategy applied not only to groups with opposing political views, but also to such social groups as the nobility, the middle class, the intelligentsia, and the clergy, as well as professional groups such as military officers and the police,” it states.
Lenin also forbade private property, and peasants throughout Russia had their food seized by the state. Lenin set strict quotas on how much was to be confiscated, and when he saw the numbers go unmet, he ordered that even seeds should be seized.
With peasants unable to plant new crops, and without a surplus of food for the winter, a man-made famine swept Russia between 1921 and 1922. According to the Hoover Institute, the famine killed between 5 million and 10 million people.
Lenin was overjoyed. According to “The Black Book of Communism,” one of his friends later recalled that Lenin “had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results,” since he claimed it “would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism.”
“Famine would also destroy faith not only in the tsar,” he added, “but in God too.”
Soviet historian Richard Pipes wrote in his book “The Unknown Lenin” that Lenin brought about the famine intentionally. He stated, “For humankind at large, Lenin had nothing but scorn.”
He said Lenin had “almost no interest” in the lives of individual people, and “he treated the working class much as a metal worker treated iron ore.”
History repeated itself under Josef Stalin, following the death of Lenin on Jan. 21, 1924. Stalin began his 29-year rule of the Soviet Union by consolidating his power and having his rivals arrested or executed.
In 1929, Stalin launched a program under the banner of “collectivism,” to not only take farmers’ belongings, but to also seize their land and destroy their ability to sell produce. He sent the Red Army to confiscate their belongings, including their farming equipment.
A famine again swept the country. In Ukraine, between 7 million and 10 million people were killed, according to United Nations estimates published in November 2003. In Kazakhstan, an estimated 1.5 million people starved, according to the Wilson Center. Meanwhile, farmers who opposed Stalin’s collectivism program were labeled “kulaks” (Russian for “fists”), and tens of thousands were rounded up and executed. Stalin also used this opportunity to strike out at enemies of his revolution, which included priests and devout religious believers.
As did Lenin, Stalin later declared the program a success. Through these movements and others that followed, Solzhenitsyn, a renowned Russian novelist and historian, estimated that Stalin killed 60 million to 66 million people.
The bloody legacy of Stalin was only surpassed by that of Mao Zedong, head of the Chinese Communist Party. Under a similar program of collectivism, Mao started his Great Leap Forward in 1958, and through various means managed to also trigger a famine that, in four years, killed at least 45 million people, according to “Mao’s Great Famine” by Hong Kong-based historian Frank Dikotter.
Cannibalism was also common during this famine. Materials uncovered by Chinese and Western scholars, and by The Washington Post in 1994, give glimpses into what took place: “In Damiao commune, Chen Zhangying and her husband Zhao Xizhen killed and boiled their 8-year-old son Xiao Qing and ate him”; and, “In Wudian commune, Wang Lanying not only picked up dead people to eat, but also sold two jin [2.2 pounds] from their bodies as pork.”
Just like Stalin and Lenin, Mao excused these deaths, according to research from religious author and historian Harun Yahya. Mao and his supporters regarded the famine as punishment for villagers not being sufficiently obedient to the Chinese Communist Party.
Just a year prior to the Great Leap Forward, in 1957, Mao held his Hundred Flowers campaign, when he invited intellectuals to present their criticisms of his regime, then used their criticisms as admissions of guilt. According to “Red Holocaust” by Steven Rosefielde, Mao labeled the estimated 550,000 intellectuals as “rightists” and then had them humiliated, fired, imprisoned, tortured, or killed.
In the book “Mao: The Unknown Story,” authors and historians Chang and Halliday show Mao was responsible for at least 70 million deaths.
Under communist regimes, and their ideology of struggle, people were turned against each other. Children reported on their parents, students beat and tortured their teachers, young people were turned against the elderly, and neighbors were turned against neighbors.
One of Marx’s partners in the First International, Mikhail Bakunin, wrote, “The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognize each other by the words ‘In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done,’” according to the book “Marx and Satan” by Richard Wurmbrand.
“In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions,” Bakunin wrote. “Our mission is to destroy, not to edify.”
This concept was seen clearly in the effects of communism, as it worked by first breaking people’s spirits through famine, then jarring them with public executions and harassment—all of which worked to turn people away from their morals and beliefs.
According to “The Great War and the Origins of Humanitarianism, 1918–1924” by Bruno Cabanes, this was seen immediately after Lenin took power.
“These ‘peasant wars’ unleashed demons on both sides: the Communists against the ‘hoarders’ and ‘enemies of the people’; the villagers against all symbols of collectivization,” Cabanes wrote.
During the famine under Stalin, there were cases of people cannibalizing human corpses, and of people kidnapping children to cannibalize. An infamous image from this time shows a Russian couple standing over the bodies of children they had partially eaten.
Similar acts of cannibalism were recorded under Mao’s Great Leap Forward, and Mao took the acts of turning people against one another a step further with additional social movements. Under his Cultural Revolution in the 1960s, children beat their own parents, students stopped and questioned people on the street about the teachings of Mao—and subsequently beat them for incorrect answers—and teachers, landlords, and intellectuals were hunted and publicly shamed or worse by Mao’s militant group, the Red Guards.
Mao branded himself as being “superhuman,” with posters and portraits of him hung throughout China.
The Cultural Revolution destroyed or damaged vast quantities of the physical components of traditional culture, such as artwork, temples, museums, and written works. It also left a spiritual void, as the Chinese people lost connection with their own history and the legacy of 5,000 years of Chinese civilization, with its rich traditions of Buddhism and Daoism.
Michael Walsh, author of “The Devil’s Pleasure Palace,” noted in a phone interview that Marx’s writings mirror the story of Lucifer in John Milton’s “Paradise Lost,” in which, realizing he can’t defeat God, he comes up with an alternative plan for vengeance by destroying the creations of God.
“It’s that notion of transcendence that communism plays on, but never succeeded at. It wants death, and it creates death. Death is the end of every communist system, and it is the goal of Satan,” Walsh said.
“What communism is, is a revenge of the losers. It plays on people’s aggrievement and their want for revenge,” he said. “Marx was the biggest loser ever. He was a bum who preyed on his friends. He was insane. It’s a cult of insanity, of aggrievement and vengeance.”
Walsh said the values at the heart of religion are something shared in nearly all societies throughout history—and that communism played on this same innate root to manipulate humankind. “Everybody wants to be the hero of their own narrative,” he said.
“[Communism] uses less admirable traits in humanity, like jealousy, to engage you in revolution—every young person wants to be a revolutionary against the established order—in order to get what you want,” Walsh said. “If it says ‘from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,’ suddenly nobody has any abilities and everybody has lots of needs. That’s the flaw in the argument.”
Communism capitalized on humankind’s desire for higher purpose, and did so by destroying religion and placing itself at the helm instead.
According to “The White Nights” by Dr. Boris Sokoloff, in October 1919, Lenin visited the scientist Ivan Pavlov, known for his conditioned reflex experiments on animals, and Lenin borrowed these animal training methods to likewise train people under the Soviet education system.
Sokoloff wrote that Lenin’s belief was that “by conditioning his reflexes, man can be standardized, can be made to think and act according to the pattern required.” Lenin said in place of individualism, “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting.”
A Dead End
Wherever the ideas of communism have been adopted, traditional religions have always been among their first targets for destruction. This held just as true under the Soviet Union, which suppressed the Russian Orthodox Church and Catholicism, as it does today under the Chinese Communist Party, which suppresses Western religions as well as Buddhism and Daoism.
“The Black Book of Communism” gives unofficial estimates of the death tolls from communist regimes elsewhere, including 1 million in Vietnam, 2 million in Cambodia, 1.7 million in Africa, 1.5 million in Afghanistan, 1 million in Eastern Europe, and 150,000 in Latin America. It estimates international communist movements and parties not in power were responsible for close to 10,000 deaths.
In “Marx and Satan,” Wurmbrand posed a question, one raised by many: After religion and culture are destroyed, what is left? The simple answer is that what’s left is a people stripped of their ability of self-control, and with that, their ability of self-governance. It creates people who look to no higher power than that of their state leaders and who see no higher ideals than those of the state. The people then become dependent on the state.
This abandonment of morals was also at the foundation of the brutality of the communist leaders and their devout followers—without a belief in a soul, in the traditional ideas of good and evil, or the ideas of a heaven or a hell, their only ambition was the ambition of the Party, and the ideas of right and wrong were boiled down to supporting or opposing the revolution. Without a belief that good and evil have consequences, the leaders and supporters of communism have carried out atrocity after atrocity.
Later in his life, Lenin was credited as saying, as Wurmbrand notes, “The state does not function as we desired. How does it function? The car does not obey. A man is at the wheel and seems to lead it, but the car does not drive in the desired direction. It moves as another force wishes.”
Lenin later went mad, but he had a moment of clarity on his deathbed, according to Wurmbrand, when he told his wife, “I committed a great error. My nightmare is to have the feeling that I’m lost in an ocean of blood from the innumerable victims. It is too late to return. To save our country, Russia, we would have needed men like Francis of Assisi [a Catholic saint]. With 10 men like him, we would have saved Russia.”
The Grand Deception
There was a grim joke among readers of the Soviet Union’s state-controlled newspaper Pravda (Russian for “truth”) that reveals an underlying theme: “The only thing that’s true in today’s newspaper is the date.”
Communism has proved to be a grand deception, a con job in human history.
The theory is bad, and every implementation of the theory has been destructive to life and morality, starting with the Paris Commune, gathering speed with the Soviet Union, and continuing today in China.
After more than 140 years of communism in practice, we can certainly judge communism by its fruits, rather than by what it claimed it would do.
No rational human being would follow such a path.
Humanity can breathe freely when Marx’s evil “specter” of communism, sooner or later, leaves the planet.